How to use this outline. This is the blueprint for the first complete sample report. Replace every bracketed note with original research and sources, then remove the #demo tag. Keep the access set to public so prospective subscribers can read the whole report.
Key points
- [The thesis in one sentence.]
- [The most important piece of evidence, with its date.]
- [The valuation conclusion: the price target, its horizon and the method, or why no target is set.]
- [The single development that would most clearly invalidate the thesis.]
- Company
- [Company name]
- Ticker
- [EXCHANGE: TICKER]
- Share price
- [$0.00]as of [date]
- Market value
- [$0.0 billion]as of [date]
- Price target
- [$0.00][12-month] horizon
Placeholder fields, no data. In a published report each figure names its source, for example the exchange closing price or the latest filing.
The company
Reported facts
[What the company sells, to whom, and how it makes money. Describe the segments and the revenue mix using the latest annual and quarterly filings, each linked.]
| Segment | Revenue [FY] | Share of total | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Segment A] | [0.0] | [0%] | [0.0%] |
| [Segment B] | [0.0] | [0%] | [0.0%] |
| Total | [0.0] | 100% | [0.0%] |
The thesis
Interpretation
[The argument in two or three sentences: what the market is missing or mispricing, and why that should change over the horizon. Keep it separate from the facts above.]
Evidence
Reported facts
- [Evidence 1: a reported result, guidance or industry figure, with its date and a link to the original source.]
- [Evidence 2.]
- [Evidence 3. Include evidence that cuts against the thesis as well as evidence for it.]
Valuation and assumptions
Forecast · Horizon: [12 months]
- Method
- [For example: forward EV/EBITDA, discounted cash flow, or both]
- Key assumptions
- [Revenue growth, margins, multiple, share count, and why each is reasonable]
- Implied change
- [+0% from the share price above]
| Scenario | What has to happen | Value per share |
|---|---|---|
| Less favorable | [Assumptions] | [$0.00] |
| Base case | [Assumptions] | [$0.00] |
| More favorable | [Assumptions] | [$0.00] |
Catalysts
| Event | Expected timing | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| [Quarterly results] | [Month, year] | [The figure that matters most and the level that would matter] |
| [Product launch, contract, regulatory decision] | [Timing] | [What to watch] |
Risks
- [Risk 1: how it could happen, how likely it seems and how much it would matter.]
- [Risk 2.]
- [Risk 3.]
What would invalidate the thesis
[Specific, observable evidence that would make you abandon the view, for example a key metric falling below a stated level for two consecutive quarters. Readers should be able to check it themselves.]
Updates
Update log
- [What changed and why. The original thesis, target and reasoning above stay exactly as published.]
Sources
- [Publisher, "Document title," date. Link to the original.]
- [Second source.]
Disclosures
Disclosure. [As of date, the author holds / does not hold a position in TICKER.] [Sponsorship or compensation related to this report: none / details.] [Other conflicts: none / details.]